📝 Transformations in the plane (14 MCQs)
📖 From Calculus • 15. Multiple Integrals Calculus • 14 questions available
What is Transformations in the plane?
Definition:
A transformation maps a region in the uv-plane to a region in the xy-plane. Common transformations include polar, linear, and nonlinear mappings.
Example:
The mapping transforms a square in uv-plane to a rotated square in xy-plane.
Reason:
Transformations simplify regions or integrands, making difficult integrals tractable by mapping them to simpler domains.
📝 All Transformations in the plane MCQs
Q1. A transformation is defined by and . Which expression correctly represents the absolute value of the Jacobian ?
📖 Explanation: Solving the transformation equations gives and . Therefore, the derivative matrix with respect to has determinant , so its absolute value is . The reciprocal relationship between the two Jacobians is essential when changing variables in a double integral.
Q2. Why is a nonzero Jacobian determinant important when using a plane transformation locally?
📖 Explanation: A nonzero Jacobian indicates that the transformation has locally independent coordinate directions. Consequently, nearby points are not collapsed into a curve or single point, and a local inverse can generally be formed. This property is what makes the change of variables meaningful for converting area elements and rewriting double integrals.
Q3. Suppose and . A student claims that because both new variables contain , the transformation cannot be inverted. Which assessment is most accurate?
📖 Explanation: The presence of the same original variable in both transformed coordinates does not prevent invertibility. The coefficient matrix is , whose determinant is , not zero. Hence the equations provide independent information and uniquely determine and from and .
Q4. A region is bounded by the lines , , , and . Which change of variables most directly converts this region into a rectangle?
📖 Explanation: The boundary lines already have the forms and . Choosing and makes the four boundaries become , , , and . Thus the original slanted region maps directly to the rectangular region , .
Q5. A model uses and to transform a region. At points where , the Jacobian of this transformation becomes zero. What is the best interpretation?
📖 Explanation: For and , the Jacobian is , which vanishes when . A zero Jacobian means the coordinate directions become locally dependent, so the mapping can lose local invertibility. Therefore, applying the standard change-of-variables formula without addressing this singular set would be unjustified.
Q6. Consider and . A region in the first quadrant is transformed using these variables. Which feature should be checked before treating the transformed region as having a simple one-to-one correspondence with the original region?
📖 Explanation: The transformation resembles the real and imaginary parts of the square of a complex number, so multiple points can potentially map to related transformed coordinates. Its Jacobian is , which is nonzero away from the origin, but global one-to-one behavior still depends on the chosen region. Thus both local nonsingularity and global uniqueness must be considered.
Q7. A rectangular region in the -plane is mapped back by , . If the rectangle has area , what is the area of its image in the -plane?
📖 Explanation: The inverse transformation has absolute Jacobian . Therefore, each small area in the -plane corresponds to half as much area in the -plane. Assuming the transformation is one-to-one on the region, the image area is . This illustrates why the Jacobian factor cannot be omitted.
Q8. A designer wants to transform the curved boundaries , , , and into constant-coordinate boundaries. Which variables are most appropriate?
📖 Explanation: Each original boundary is already expressed through either the product or the ratio . Setting and turns the four boundaries into , , , and . This produces a rectangular description in the transformed coordinate system, provided the selected region avoids ambiguity.
Q9. A student transforms , , calculates , and then multiplies the transformed integral by . What is the student's main error?
📖 Explanation: The calculated determinant is the Jacobian from to , whereas the transformed area element requires . The correct factor is therefore . Using both reverses orientation and applies the wrong magnitude of area scaling.
Q10. Another student argues that if the Jacobian is negative, the transformed integral must always have a negative value. Why is this reasoning incorrect?
📖 Explanation: The sign of a Jacobian determinant records orientation: a negative value means the mapping reverses local orientation. However, ordinary area is nonnegative, so the change-of-variables formula uses the absolute value of the relevant Jacobian. The sign of the determinant therefore does not by itself determine whether the integral is positive or negative.
Q11. A graph shows a family of parallel diagonal lines labeled by , and another family of parallel diagonal lines crossing them at right angles labeled by . A region is bounded by two lines from each family. Which conclusion is most reasonable?
📖 Explanation: If the displayed boundary families correspond to and , then choosing those quantities as transformed coordinates converts the four-sided region into a coordinate rectangle. The visual structure indicates that the transformation is aligned with the geometry of the boundaries rather than the original - and -axes.
Q12. A computational model uses and to simplify a region, but the integrand contains . Which strategy is most efficient?
📖 Explanation: A successful transformation requires changing more than just the limits. From and , one obtains , while the area factor is . Rewriting both the integrand and differential area consistently is necessary for an equivalent integral.
Q13. Suppose a transformation maps a small -rectangle into a parallelogram whose area is approximately three times larger. What does this suggest about the local Jacobian magnitude at that point?
📖 Explanation: A Jacobian determinant measures local area scaling. If the transformation from to expands area by a factor of approximately , then is approximately . The inverse Jacobian therefore has magnitude approximately . The distinction between forward and inverse transformations is crucial.
Q14. Two proposed transformations describe the same original region. Method A makes the boundaries rectangular but produces a complicated integrand. Method B produces a simple integrand but leaves curved, difficult bounds. Which choice is generally preferable for evaluating a double integral?
📖 Explanation: A good change of variables balances all parts of the transformed integral. A rectangular region is valuable, but a highly complicated integrand or Jacobian can eliminate that advantage. Conversely, simple algebra with difficult limits may also be inefficient. Comparing the transformed integrand, Jacobian, and bounds provides the soundest basis for selecting a method.