📝 Lossless compression techniques in multimedia (46 MCQs)
📖 From Data Communication and Networks • 28. Multimedia • 46 questions available
What is Lossless compression techniques in multimedia?
Lossless compression techniques in multimedia are methods that reduce file size by eliminating statistical redundancy without discarding any original data, ensuring that the decompressed file is bit-for-bit identical to the original, which is essential for text, medical imaging, and archival purposes where perfect accuracy is required.
📝 All Lossless compression techniques in multimedia MCQs
Q1. Which of the following best defines lossless compression?
📖 Explanation: Lossless compression means the original data can be perfectly reconstructed after decompression, so no information is permanently discarded. This differentiates it from lossy methods that sacrifice fidelity for higher compression ratios.
Q2. Which algorithm is an example of lossless compression?
📖 Explanation: LZW (Lempel‑Ziv‑Welch) is a classic lossless dictionary‑based algorithm used in GIF images and Unix compress utilities. MP3, JPEG, and MPEG‑2 are lossy techniques that discard some original information to achieve higher compression.
Q3. Typical lossless compression ratios for text files fall within which range?
📖 Explanation: For ordinary English text, lossless methods usually achieve about two to three times reduction, because the redundancy in natural language is limited compared to the higher ratios possible with lossy schemes.
Q4. What property guarantees that a lossless compressor can reconstruct the exact original file?
📖 Explanation: Deterministic decoding ensures that each compressed bitstream maps to a unique original sequence, enabling perfect reconstruction without ambiguity.
Q5. How does lossless compression differ from lossy compression?
📖 Explanation: Lossless algorithms eliminate statistical redundancy while preserving every original bit, whereas lossy techniques discard information deemed less important to human perception, achieving higher compression at the cost of fidelity.
Q6. If a file is encoded with Huffman coding, how does the average code length relate to the source symbol probabilities?
📖 Explanation: Huffman coding produces variable‑length codes whose average length is within one bit of the source entropy; as the symbol distribution becomes more skewed, the average length approaches the theoretical entropy limit.
Q7. Suppose a text file contains many repeated substrings. What is the most likely effect of applying LZW compression?
📖 Explanation: LZW builds a dictionary of recurring patterns; repeated substrings are replaced by short dictionary indices, leading to a substantial reduction in size when such redundancy is abundant.
Q8. Why must lossless compression be used for executable programs?
📖 Explanation: Executable binaries require exact bit‑for‑bit restoration; even a single altered instruction could cause runtime errors or security vulnerabilities, making lossless methods the only safe choice.
Q9. If redundancy in a data stream is eliminated, what is the most direct impact on transmission time over a fixed‑rate channel?
📖 Explanation: Removing redundancy reduces the number of bits to send; with a constant channel bandwidth, the time needed scales directly with the reduced bit count, yielding faster delivery.
Q10. Consider two compressors: Compressor X uses fixed‑length codes, while Compressor Y uses variable‑length Huffman codes. Which statement is true regarding average bits per symbol?
📖 Explanation: Variable‑length Huffman coding adapts to symbol probabilities, assigning shorter codes to frequent symbols, thus typically reducing the average bits per symbol compared with fixed‑length encoding.
Q11. A lossless compressor achieves a compression ratio of 2.5 : 1 on a file. If the original file is 5 MB, what is the size after compression?
📖 Explanation: A ratio of 2.5 : 1 means the compressed size is original divided by 2.5, i.e., . However, rounding to the nearest whole megabyte yields 2 MB, making option B the correct choice.
Q12. If a lossless algorithm compresses data to exactly the entropy limit, what can be said about its redundancy?
📖 Explanation: When compression reaches the entropy bound, all statistical redundancy has been removed; the remaining bits represent the irreducible information content, meaning no further reduction is possible without loss.
Q13. How does increasing the block size in arithmetic coding affect compression efficiency and computational cost?
📖 Explanation: Larger blocks allow the coder to capture finer probability models, improving efficiency, but they also require more precise arithmetic operations and larger tables, raising computational complexity.
Q14. When applying run‑length encoding (RLE) to an image with high frequency of color changes, what is the expected outcome?
📖 Explanation: RLE compresses consecutive identical values; images with frequent color changes lack long runs, so the algorithm yields little benefit and may even add overhead, resulting in negligible reduction.
Q15. A researcher claims that lossless compression can achieve a ratio of 10 : 1 on plain text. Which logical inference is most plausible?
📖 Explanation: Achieving 10 : 1 on ordinary text would require extraordinary redundancy, such as repeated blocks or structured data; otherwise, it would contradict the entropy limit for natural language.
Q16. If a lossless codec is used on already compressed (e.g., ZIP) data, what is the likely effect?
📖 Explanation: Compressed data already lacks redundancy; applying another lossless stage typically cannot reduce size and may add a small header, leading to little change or a marginal increase.
Q17. Which scenario most strongly justifies the use of lossless compression over lossy compression?
📖 Explanation: Medical images often require exact pixel values for diagnosis; any loss could obscure critical details, making lossless compression essential despite lower compression ratios.
Q18. How does the concept of entropy guide the design of a lossless compressor?
📖 Explanation: Entropy quantifies the average information per symbol; a lower entropy indicates more predictability, allowing compressors to exploit redundancy and approach the theoretical limit of compression.
Q19. Consider two files: File A has entropy bits/symbol, File B has bits/symbol. Which file can, in theory, be compressed more effectively?
📖 Explanation: A lower entropy means the source is more predictable, so a lossless algorithm can remove more redundancy, yielding a higher compression ratio for File B.
Q20. If a lossless algorithm uses a static dictionary built from a corpus, what is a potential drawback when compressing a text with uncommon terminology?
📖 Explanation: A static dictionary may not contain the rare terms, causing the algorithm to fall back to less efficient encoding for those symbols, reducing overall compression.
Q21. Which of the following best explains why lossless compression cannot achieve arbitrarily high ratios?
📖 Explanation: The entropy of the source defines the minimum average bits needed per symbol; compression cannot go below this bound without discarding information, thus limiting the achievable ratio.
Q22. In a scenario where bandwidth is limited but error‑free transmission is required, why might a designer prefer a slower, higher‑ratio lossless compressor?
📖 Explanation: When bandwidth is scarce, reducing the total bits to send saves capacity, even if encoding takes longer; error‑free transmission still demands exact reconstruction, so a high‑ratio lossless method is advantageous.
Q23. A file compressed with a lossless algorithm is later corrupted by a single bit error. What is the most likely outcome after decompression?
📖 Explanation: Lossless schemes lack inherent error‑correction; a single bit flip can disrupt code boundaries, causing the decoder to misinterpret subsequent symbols, leading to failure or severe corruption.
Q24. Which statement correctly contrasts Huffman coding and LZW compression regarding dictionary usage?
📖 Explanation: Huffman creates a code tree based on symbol frequencies (often static for a block), whereas LZW constructs a dictionary on‑the‑fly, adding new entries as it processes the data.
Q25. If the average code length after Huffman coding is bits/symbol and the source entropy is bits/symbol, what is the coding efficiency?
📖 Explanation: Efficiency is or 87 %; the closest answer is 90 %, indicating high but not perfect efficiency.
Q26. When compressing a bitmap image with lossless PNG, which factor most influences the final file size?
📖 Explanation: PNG employs filtering and DEFLATE; large uniform areas produce long runs that compress well, making the amount of homogeneous regions a primary determinant of size.
Q27. A developer argues that using a larger block size in LZW always yields better compression. Which analytical conclusion refutes this claim?
📖 Explanation: Beyond a certain point, expanding the block size grows the dictionary but seldom discovers new patterns; the overhead outweighs marginal gains, so larger blocks do not guarantee better compression.
Q28. Which logical chain correctly explains why lossless compression is essential for archival of source code?
📖 Explanation: Source code must remain unchanged after storage; even a single bit error can alter program semantics, so lossless techniques that guarantee perfect fidelity are mandatory.
Q29. In comparing two lossless compressors, Compressor P achieves a compression ratio of 1.8 : 1 in 0.5 seconds, while Compressor Q achieves 2.2 : 1 in 2 seconds. Which analytical assessment is most appropriate?
📖 Explanation: The decision hinges on the application's constraints: if rapid processing is crucial, P may be preferred; if storage economy outweighs time, Q offers better reduction.
Q30. If a lossless algorithm reaches the entropy limit for a source, what can be inferred about any further attempts to compress the same data?
📖 Explanation: Once the entropy bound is met, all statistical redundancy is exhausted; any additional lossless step would either reproduce the same size or add overhead, making further reduction impossible.
Q31. Which conceptual principle explains why lossless compression can be applied repeatedly to the same data without loss of information?
📖 Explanation: Because the output is still a deterministic bitstream, it can serve as input to another lossless compressor; however, subsequent passes typically yield diminishing returns as redundancy diminishes.
Q32. A multimedia system streams high‑resolution images using lossless compression. If network latency doubles, what is the most likely impact on perceived quality?
📖 Explanation: Lossless compression guarantees identical image fidelity; increased latency only delays delivery, not the visual quality of the received images.
Q33. When designing a lossless compressor for sensor data with known statistical model, which approach yields the highest theoretical compression?
📖 Explanation: Arithmetic coding can exploit the exact probability distribution of the model, approaching the entropy limit more closely than Huffman, which is limited to integer‑bit code lengths.
Q34. If a lossless compression algorithm outputs a file larger than the original, which inference is most consistent with the algorithm's design?
📖 Explanation: When data lacks redundancy, the algorithm cannot find patterns to shorten; the added headers or dictionary tables can cause a slight increase, which is expected behavior for many lossless schemes.
Q35. Which logical reasoning best explains why lossless compression is unsuitable for streaming high‑definition video in real time?
📖 Explanation: High‑definition video requires very high compression ratios to fit within limited bandwidth; lossless techniques typically achieve only modest reductions, making them impractical for real‑time streaming where latency and bandwidth are critical.
Q36. In a comparative study, method X (Huffman) achieves 1.9 : 1 ratio, while method Y (Arithmetic) achieves 2.1 : 1 on the same dataset. Which analytical conclusion is valid?
📖 Explanation: Higher compression often comes with increased processing; the decision depends on whether the modest gain outweighs the extra CPU time, especially in resource‑constrained environments.
Q37. A student claims that applying lossless compression twice will double the compression ratio. Which conceptual correction addresses the misconception?
📖 Explanation: After the first pass, most redundancy is removed; a second pass can only compress the remaining small amount of structure, so the overall ratio grows only marginally.
Q38. If a lossless algorithm encodes a symbol with probability using a code of length 3 bits, how does this compare to the optimal code length dictated by entropy?
📖 Explanation: Entropy for is bits; a 3‑bit code exceeds the optimal by 1 bit, but among integer‑length codes, the excess is 1 bit, making the statement about 0.5 bits inaccurate; the closest answer is that it is longer.
Q39. When compressing a database backup containing many identical rows, which logical effect does lossless compression have on storage requirements?
📖 Explanation: Identical rows create long runs and repeated fields, which lossless techniques like RLE or dictionary coding can exploit, leading to notable storage savings.
Q40. Which analytical factor most influences the choice between Huffman coding and arithmetic coding for a given application?
📖 Explanation: Arithmetic coding usually yields better compression at the cost of more complex arithmetic operations, while Huffman is simpler and faster; the trade‑off guides the selection based on performance constraints.
Q41. A multimedia pipeline uses lossless compression for intermediate frames before applying a lossy encoder. What conceptual benefit does this provide?
📖 Explanation: By preserving the original data exactly before the lossy step, any subsequent degradation is solely due to the intended lossy encoding, allowing precise control over quality loss.
Q42. If a lossless compressor achieves a compression ratio of 1.6 : 1 on a dataset with measured entropy bits/symbol, what can be inferred about its performance?
📖 Explanation: A ratio of 1.6 : 1 corresponds to an average code length of about bits/symbol, which is near the entropy (1.5 bits), indicating the algorithm operates close to the theoretical bound with minimal overhead.
Q43. Which logical reasoning explains why lossless compression is mandatory for legal documents?
📖 Explanation: Legal texts must retain exact wording; even minor changes could alter meaning or invalidate contracts, so lossless compression ensures the stored document is bit‑identical to the original.
Q44. In a scenario where a lossless algorithm is paired with a forward error correction (FEC) scheme, what is the combined effect on data integrity?
📖 Explanation: Lossless compression guarantees that the decompressed data matches the source, and FEC adds parity to detect and correct errors during transmission, together providing robust integrity.
Q45. When evaluating two lossless compressors, one yields higher compression but requires significantly more memory. Which analytical decision framework should be applied?
📖 Explanation: The optimal choice depends on the system's resources and priorities; if memory is limited, the lower‑memory compressor may be preferable despite modest compression, whereas ample memory may justify the higher‑ratio method.
Q46. If a lossless compression algorithm is applied to a random bitstream generated by a true RNG, what is the expected outcome?
📖 Explanation: Random data has maximal entropy; there is no redundancy to exploit, so the algorithm cannot compress it and may add overhead, resulting in little change or a small size increase.