π Work integrals in vector fields (14 MCQs)
π From Calculus β’ 16. Topics in vector Calculus β’ 14 questions available
What is Work integrals in vector fields?
Work integrals in vector fields:
Work is , the energy transferred by a force field along a path.
Example:
Work by (spring force) from to along a straight line gives .
Reason:
Work integrals are central to physics, linking force, displacement, and energy in mechanical systems.
π All Work integrals in vector fields MCQs
Q1. A force field is given by . A particle moves from to along any smooth path. Which conclusion about the work integral is justified?
π Explanation: The field is , so it is conservative on the plane. Therefore the work between two fixed endpoints depends only on the endpoints, not on the particular smooth path. The geometric length, crossings, or shape of the path do not determine the work.
Q2. For a vector field , the work along a parametrized curve , , is evaluated using which expression?
π Explanation: Work measures the component of the force acting in the instantaneous direction of displacement. Since dr=r'(t)dt, the correct line integral is W=\int_a^b F(r(t))\cdot r'(t)\,dt. Using only the magnitude of the force ignores directional alignment and generally gives an incorrect result.
Q3. Suppose a force field is conservative and a particle travels from to , first along path and then along a much longer path . Why can the two work integrals still have the same value?
π Explanation: For a conservative force field, there is a potential function such that . The work from to equals , so intermediate bends, detours, and path lengths do not change the total work. Speed is also irrelevant to this mathematical line integral.
Q4. A student claims that if a particle follows a closed curve , then for every vector field . Which response best evaluates the claim?
π Explanation: A closed path has the same initial and final point, but that alone does not force the work to vanish. If is conservative, the potential change around the loop is zero. A nonconservative field can produce nonzero circulation and therefore nonzero work around a closed curve.
Q5. A force field is , and a particle moves along the straight segment from to . What is the work done by the field?
π Explanation: Parameterize the segment by , . Then r'(t)=(2,2), while . Their dot product is , so . The result follows from correctly combining the field with the displacement direction.
Q6. A particle moves from to along two different paths. For , one path is the straight diagonal and another consists of the two coordinate-axis segments. What does comparison of the work integrals reveal?
π Explanation: Along the diagonal , and , giving work . Along the axes, the first segment has , giving zero work, and the second has with displacement in the y-direction, again giving zero. Thus the work is path-dependent.
Q7. A field acts on a particle moving from to . Without evaluating a complicated parametrization, determine the work.
π Explanation: The field is conservative because . Therefore the work equals the potential change: . This exposes an important modelling check: if no option equals , the options are inconsistent. A student should not manipulate the calculation to fit a distractor.
Q8. A student computes work for along , , as . What is the student's main error?
π Explanation: The field must be evaluated along the curve and then dotted with the tangent vector. Here and r'(t)=(1,2t), so the integrand is , not . The student's expression effectively ignores the actual displacement direction and magnitude.
Q9. A graph shows a particle traveling around a closed loop in a field whose arrows consistently circulate counterclockwise and have positive tangential components along the loop. Which qualitative conclusion is most reasonable?
π Explanation: If the field vectors have positive tangential components along the direction of traversal throughout the loop, then is predominantly positive. Consequently, the accumulated work is positive. Being a closed path does not force zero work; zero circulation is guaranteed only under appropriate conservative-field conditions.
Q10. On a graph, a particle travels from to . Along the first half of the path, force vectors point mostly in the direction of motion; along the second half, they point mostly opposite the motion. The vectors have equal magnitudes over equal path lengths. What is the best inference?
π Explanation: Work depends on the dot product , so force components parallel to the motion contribute positively or negatively according to their direction. If equal force magnitudes act over equal path lengths with exactly opposite tangential directions in the two portions, their contributions cancel. The net work is then zero, despite nonzero forces.
Q11. Two students calculate the work of the same force field along the same curve. Student A reverses the parametrization but obtains the same value. Student B changes the parametrization direction and obtains the negative value. Who is correct?
π Explanation: Reversing the direction of traversal changes to , so the work integral changes sign. Thus Student B correctly recognizes that work is orientation-dependent for an oriented path. Student A would be correct only if the direction had not actually been reversed or if the work happened to be zero.
Q12. A force field is . A model predicts that the work between two fixed points is path-independent. Which test most directly challenges the model before calculating multiple path integrals?
π Explanation: For a sufficiently smooth planar field , path independence is associated with the compatibility condition on an appropriate simply connected region. Here and , so the test supports conservativity. This is more informative than path length or force magnitude.
Q13. A particle moves from to under a conservative force. An engineer evaluates the work using a curved numerical path, while another engineer uses a straight-line path. They obtain slightly different numerical answers. What is the most likely explanation?
π Explanation: For a conservative field, exact work between fixed endpoints is independent of the chosen path. Therefore, different numerical approximations should converge to the same value as accuracy improves. A discrepancy suggests numerical integration error, an incorrect parametrization, or an implementation mistake rather than a physical dependence on path shape.
Q14. Consider and a circular path , , traversed counterclockwise. Which conclusion follows from direct analysis of the force relative to the motion?
π Explanation: Along the circle, , while r'(t)=(-\sin t,\cos t). Their dot product is . Therefore . The field consistently opposes the counterclockwise tangent direction, producing negative work around the loop.