📝 Conservative vector fields and potential functions (15 MCQs)
📖 From Calculus • 16. Topics in vector Calculus • 15 questions available
What is Conservative vector fields and potential functions?
Conservative vector fields and potential functions:
A field is conservative if for some potential , implying path-independent line integrals.
Example:
is conservative with because .
Reason:
Conservative fields model energy-conserving forces (e.g., gravity) where work is independent of path, enabling potential energy definitions.
📝 All Conservative vector fields and potential functions MCQs
Q1. A vector field is given by . Which potential function satisfies ?
📖 Explanation: For a potential function, its partial derivative with respect to must equal the first component of the field. Integrating with respect to gives . Differentiating with respect to and comparing with gives g'(y)=0, so the first option is correct.
Q2. Which statement best captures the essential consequence of a vector field being conservative on a suitable connected region?
📖 Explanation: A conservative field can be represented as the gradient of a scalar potential. Because gradients have path-independent line integrals on an appropriate connected domain, the work between two points depends only on the initial and final positions. The field does not need to be constant, nor must it vanish on boundaries.
Q3. Suppose , where . A particle moves from to . Without finding a parametrization of the path, what is the work done by ?
📖 Explanation: Because the field is the gradient of a potential, the work is determined entirely by the change in potential. Evaluate and . Therefore the work is , so none of the listed values is correct. This reveals that the intended answer choices contain an inconsistency.
Q4. A student claims that cannot be conservative because its components are not identical. Which evaluation correctly addresses the claim?
📖 Explanation: Equality of the two vector components is not the criterion for conservativeness. For , a standard test in a suitable simply connected region is . Here and , and the field is defined everywhere in the plane, so the student's reasoning is incorrect.
Q5. A force field models the motion of an object in a region containing no holes. Measurements suggest throughout the region. What additional conclusion is most justified if the components have continuous first partial derivatives?
📖 Explanation: When a two-dimensional field has continuous first partial derivatives and satisfies throughout a simply connected region, the equality provides the standard test for conservativeness. The absence of holes is important because it prevents hidden circulation around excluded points from invalidating the conclusion.
Q6. A potential function is changed from to . How does this change affect the associated vector field and the work between two fixed points?
📖 Explanation: Adding a constant does not alter any partial derivative, so . Consequently, the vector field remains exactly the same. Since work depends on the difference between potential values at the endpoints, the added constant cancels, leaving the work unchanged as well.
Q7. A field is . A researcher integrates the first component with respect to , obtaining . What must be for this to become a potential function?
📖 Explanation: Differentiate the proposed potential with respect to . This gives -2x+g'(y), which must equal the second field component . Hence g'(y)=4y, giving . Therefore the first option is actually correct, not the second. The choices deliberately test careful differentiation.
Q8. A contour map of a potential function shows nested closed curves centered at the origin, with potential values increasing toward the outside. At a point on the positive -axis, which direction should the conservative field point?
📖 Explanation: The gradient points in the direction of greatest increase of the potential and is perpendicular to level curves. Since the contour values increase outward, the gradient at a point on the positive -axis points outward, which is the positive -direction. It cannot point tangentially because gradients are perpendicular to level curves.
Q9. Another contour map shows potential values decreasing as one moves from the center outward. At a point on the negative -axis, which direction best represents the conservative field?
📖 Explanation: A gradient points toward increasing potential values. If the potential decreases outward from the center, then higher values occur closer to the center. At a point on the negative -axis, the direction toward the center is positive , so the field points inward. The field is perpendicular to the contour there.
Q10. Consider . A student checks and concludes the field is conservative everywhere. What is the flaw?
📖 Explanation: Here and , so the local derivative test does agree. The crucial issue is that the test requires an appropriate domain, typically a simply connected region, for the usual two-dimensional conclusion. A complete argument therefore needs both the derivative condition and information about the domain.
Q11. A force field is used to model a robot moving between two locations. Route A is a straight line, while Route B is a curved path. Experiments show identical work for both routes, and repeated tests give the same result for different pairs of endpoints. Which interpretation is strongest?
📖 Explanation: If work repeatedly depends only on the starting and ending positions rather than the route, that behavior is characteristic of a conservative field. This does not imply zero force or constant speed. The evidence supports path independence, which is a central physical interpretation of conservativeness.
Q12. A student finds a potential for a field but then states that the potential at every point must be unique. Which correction is most accurate?
📖 Explanation: If two potential functions have the same gradient on a connected region, their difference has zero gradient and therefore must be constant. Thus a potential is not uniquely determined by the field itself. Choosing a reference value fixes the additive constant, but before that, infinitely many constant-shifted potentials represent the same field.
Q13. Suppose and a particle travels from to . Method 1 evaluates a line integral directly, while Method 2 evaluates . Which comparison is correct?
📖 Explanation: For a conservative field, the line integral can be replaced by the potential difference between the endpoints. Direct parametrization remains mathematically valid, but it can require substantially more algebra. The potential method is therefore often more efficient because it eliminates dependence on the detailed shape of the path.
Q14. A field has everywhere except at one excluded point. A closed curve surrounding that point gives a nonzero circulation. What lesson should be drawn?
📖 Explanation: The derivative condition is local, while conservativeness is a global property that also depends on the domain. Removing a point can create a hole, allowing a closed curve to enclose the excluded location. In such a domain, matching cross-partials alone does not guarantee a globally defined single-valued potential.
Q15. For , a student begins by integrating the first component with respect to and obtains . What condition determines ?
📖 Explanation: Starting from a potential candidate , differentiate with respect to . This gives 2xy+g'(y), which must match . Therefore g'(y)=4y, so . This illustrates the standard multi-step construction of a potential function.