📝 Tabular integration by parts method (35 MCQs)
📖 From Calculus • 8. Principles of integral Evaluation • 35 questions available
What is Tabular integration by parts method?
Definition:
Tabular integration is a streamlined shortcut for repeated integration by parts, organizing derivatives of and integrals of in columns with alternating signs to quickly compute the result without writing out each step.
Example:
For , list derivatives of (2x, 2, 0) and integrals of (-cos, -sin, cos) with signs (+, -, +), yielding .
Reason:
This method reduces computational errors and saves time for integrals requiring multiple iterations, providing a clear visual structure for tracking terms and signs.
📝 All Tabular integration by parts method MCQs
Q1. When applying tabular integration by parts to , the process terminates because:
📖 Explanation: Tabular integration by parts is a systematic method for integrating products where one function (typically a polynomial) eventually differentiates to zero. In , the polynomial is repeatedly differentiated until its derivative becomes 0. The trigonometric function is integrated repeatedly in the adjacent column, creating a pattern that does not terminate on its own. The process stops because the polynomial column reaches zero, not because the trigonometric column terminates.
Q2. For the integral , which arrangement of columns in tabular integration by parts is correct for the LIATE rule?
📖 Explanation: The LIATE rule (Logarithmic, Inverse trigonometric, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential) suggests that the Algebraic function should be chosen as (the function to differentiate) because it simplifies upon differentiation. The Exponential function should be chosen as (the function to integrate) because it is easily integrated and does not become more complicated. This arrangement ensures that the derivatives of eventually reach zero, making tabular integration efficient. The other options violate LIATE principles and would lead to a more complicated or non-terminating process.
Q3. A student attempts to evaluate using tabular integration by parts but stops after three rows, getting . What error did the student make?
📖 Explanation: In tabular integration by parts, the process must continue until the polynomial column differentiates to zero. For , the derivatives are . The student stopped at the third derivative (6) without completing the final row where the derivative becomes 0. The correct result should include the last term from the integration of the zero row, and the signs must follow the alternating pattern. Stopping prematurely leads to missing terms and an incorrect constant of integration. The student also likely misapplied the sign pattern, as the correct answer requires from the final integration of the zero row.
Q4. Which integral is most efficiently solved using tabular integration by parts rather than standard integration by parts?
📖 Explanation: Tabular integration by parts is most efficient when one function in the product is a polynomial that can be differentiated repeatedly to zero. For , repeated differentiation of yields a finite number of terms (derivatives ), making tabular integration a structured and efficient method. Standard integration by parts would require four separate Easys, which is tedious. and require only one Easy of standard integration by parts, while involves a circular integration pattern that is better handled by the standard method with a trick.
Q5. When using tabular integration by parts for , what is the coefficient of in the final antiderivative after correctly applying the alternating signs?
📖 Explanation: To evaluate , differentiate the polynomial: , f'(x) = 2x + 3, f''(x) = 2, f'''(x) = 0. Integrate repeatedly: , , . Applying the alternating signs : . The coefficient of from the first and third terms is . However, after simplification, the polynomial coefficient of is .
Q6. A student claims that tabular integration by parts cannot be used for because neither function differentiates to zero. Is the student correct?
📖 Explanation: The student is incorrect because tabular integration by parts can be extended to handle periodic functions like and . While neither function differentiates to zero, the process creates a cycle of derivatives and integrals that eventually returns to the original product after a few steps. By setting up the table, multiplying with alternating signs, and then solving for the original integral, one can evaluate it efficiently. This technique is often used when the integrand is a product of exponential and trigonometric functions, showing that tabular integration is not limited to polynomial cases.
Q7. For , the tabular method gives . Which of the following would be the result if the signs in the table were all positive instead of alternating?
📖 Explanation: The alternating signs are crucial in tabular integration by parts because they correspond to the pattern from the integration by parts formula. If all signs were positive, the terms would not correctly combine to represent the integral. For , the correct result with alternating signs is . With all positive signs, the result would incorrectly be , which does not differentiate back to the original integrand. The sign pattern is derived from the repeated Easy of .
Q8. The derivative of a polynomial function of degree 4 eventually becomes zero after how many differentiations?
📖 Explanation: A polynomial of degree has the property that its -th derivative is zero. For a degree 4 polynomial, the derivatives are: first derivative (degree 3), second (degree 2), third (degree 1), fourth (degree 0), and fifth (zero). Therefore, it takes 5 differentiations to reach zero. This is the fundamental reason why tabular integration by parts terminates for polynomial functions: the polynomial column eventually becomes zero, leaving no further terms to integrate. This property makes tabular integration particularly powerful for integrals involving polynomials.
Q9. In the tabular method, if you start with and , the final row of the table before the zero row is:
📖 Explanation: When differentiating repeatedly, the derivatives are: . When integrating repeatedly, the integrals are: . The row before the zero row (third derivative of ) is the pair . This row is multiplied by the sign for that row and contributes to the final integral. The next row would be , which contributes nothing (since 0 times anything is 0), effectively terminating the process.
Q10. For , what is the coefficient of in the final answer after applying tabular integration?
📖 Explanation: Using tabular integration, differentiate to get . Integrate to get . Apply signs to the products. The result is: . The coefficient of is the negative of this polynomial, so the coefficient is .
Q11. Which of the following is a limitation of tabular integration by parts?
📖 Explanation: Tabular integration by parts is most effective when one of the functions in the product is a polynomial that can be differentiated repeatedly to zero. This is its primary limitation and why it is not universally applicable. While it can be extended to handle products of exponentials and trigonometric functions through a cyclic process, the standard, most efficient use of the method requires a polynomial factor. It can handle definite integrals by evaluating the antiderivative at the limits, and it is not inherently more complicated than standard integration by parts for suitable integrands.
Q12. When evaluating using tabular integration, the polynomial column's derivatives are , , , . The column's integrals are , , , . What is the correct sum after applying alternating signs?
📖 Explanation: Applying the signs to the products: . Simplifying: . Combining like terms: .
Q13. If a student uses tabular integration for and obtains , what does this indicate about the sign pattern they used?
📖 Explanation: The correct Easy of tabular integration for with alternating signs yields . The student's answer has the signs reversed for the first and third terms, indicating they likely started with a minus sign (). This pattern would result in . The student's result is incorrect because it does not differentiate back to the original integrand, confirming an error in the sign assignment, which is a common mistake in tabular integration.
Q14. What makes tabular integration by parts a preferred method over standard integration by parts for ?
📖 Explanation: For , tabular integration by parts organizes the repeated differentiations of and integrations of into a neat table, which significantly reduces the chance of algebraic errors that can occur when applying integration by parts five times. While it still requires multiple steps, the tabular format makes the process systematic and easier to track, especially for polynomials of high degree. It doesn't necessarily require fewer steps, but it makes the process more transparent and less prone to mistakes. The antiderivative is not more compact; in fact, it is a polynomial times .
Q15. When extending tabular integration to , the process creates a system of equations. Which of the following correctly describes why this happens?
📖 Explanation: When integrating products of exponential and trigonometric functions, the trigonometric function cycles through derivatives and integrals that return to the original function after a few steps. This cyclic nature means the table does not terminate; instead, it creates a loop. By setting up the table and applying the alternating signs, the result will include the original integral on the right side. This allows you to solve for the integral algebraically. The exponential function does not differentiate to zero, and the table doesn't have infinite rows because you stop when the cycle repeats, usually after two or four steps.
Q16. A student evaluating using tabular integration by parts sets and . Is this a correct choice?
📖 Explanation: The LIATE rule suggests choosing (Logarithmic) as because its derivative is simpler. Tabular integration can be applied here because differentiates to a rational function, and while it may not terminate to zero, the process can still be useful. In this case, it requires two steps: differentiate to , then to , and integrate to , then to . The method still works because the resulting integral after the first Easy is simpler, but tabular integration is not strictly necessary here; a single Easy of standard integration by parts would suffice.
Q17. What is the result of using tabular integration?
📖 Explanation: Differentiate to get . Integrate to get . Apply signs to the products: . Simplify: . Combine like terms: . There appears to be a misalignment in the provided options; the correct simplification leads to . Option A is the closest, but it has a different constant term. Let's re-evaluate: The constant term from the second product is (from gives ). The third product is . The fourth is . Sum of constants: . So the coefficient of is . None of the options match exactly. The correct option should be . This highlights the need for careful simplification in tabular integration.
Q18. The graph of a polynomial and its derivatives shows has a root at , p'(x) has roots at and , and p''(x) is constant. If is evaluated using tabular integration, what can you say about the complexity of the result?
📖 Explanation: The complexity of the antiderivative from tabular integration is determined by the degree of the polynomial, not its specific roots or the values of its derivatives at specific points. A polynomial of degree 2 will always produce an antiderivative with three terms (from p(x), p'(x), p''(x)), regardless of where its roots are. The roots of the polynomial or its derivatives do not affect the number of terms in the final result, only the values of the coefficients. Having a root at for would affect the constant term but not the number of terms. Therefore, all statements about complexity based on roots are incorrect.
Q19. For where is a positive integer, how does the number of terms in the antiderivative from tabular integration relate to ?
📖 Explanation: The number of terms in the antiderivative is determined by the number of non-zero derivatives of , which is derivatives plus the original function, giving terms. For example, for , the derivatives are , which produces three non-zero rows, thus three terms in the final antiderivative. This is a direct consequence of the tabular method: each row (except the zero row) contributes a term. The coefficient in affects the values of the coefficients but not the number of terms.
Q20. A student claims that tabular integration by parts is always faster than standard integration by parts for . Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of this claim?
📖 Explanation: While tabular integration by parts is a powerful organizational tool that can reduce errors and make repeated Easys more systematic, the assertion that it is 'always faster' is subjective and depends on the individual's familiarity with both methods. For a highly skilled practitioner, standard integration by parts might be just as fast, especially for lower-degree polynomials where the pattern is obvious. Tabular integration is not inherently faster; it primarily reduces the cognitive load by providing a clear structure. The actual speed is a matter of personal proficiency and the specific problem context. Therefore, the claim is false because it makes an absolute statement about speed, which is not guaranteed.
Q21. Which of the following scenarios would make tabular integration by parts the MOST advantageous technique?
📖 Explanation: Tabular integration by parts is most advantageous when the integrand is a product of a high-degree polynomial and a function that is easily integrated repeatedly, such as or . A polynomial of degree 5 integrated with requires multiple Easys of integration by parts, which are efficiently managed by the tabular method. In contrast, an integrand with a logarithmic function (like ) is typically integrated with a single Easy of standard integration by parts, and products of exponentials and trigonometric functions are often handled with a cyclic integration technique rather than simple tabular iteration.
Q22. When integrating using tabular integration, the signs are . What would be the result if the signs were incorrectly applied as ?
📖 Explanation: The correct Easy of signs for yields . If the signs are reversed to , the result becomes the negative of the correct answer, which is . This reversed-sign pattern is a common error. It changes the sign of every term in the antiderivative, making it incorrect because it will not differentiate back to the original integrand. The correct sign pattern is crucial for the validity of the result.
Q23. In the tabular method for , the polynomial column differentiates to and . The trigonometric column integrates to and . If the final answer is , what was the sign pattern applied?
📖 Explanation: To find the sign pattern, look at the terms: The first term is , so the sign for row 0 is . The second term is , which simplifies to . However, the given answer has . This means the sign for row 1 must be , because . So the sign is . The third term comes from . The given answer has , so the sign for row 2 must be . Therefore, the sign pattern is .
Q24. A common mistake in tabular integration is forgetting to multiply by the signs. For , a student forgot the signs and got . What would the correct result be?
📖 Explanation: For , the derivatives are , and the integrals of are all . The correct sign pattern is . Therefore, the result is . If the student forgot the signs but still had the correct structure, they might have used all plus signs, leading to , or some other combination. The correct answer is the one with the alternating signs . Interestingly, the student's result actually has the correct signs, so the student did not forget them; they might have made a different mistake. The question states they forgot the signs but produced a result with the signs, creating a paradox. The correct result is , which shows the student's answer is actually correct. The question is designed to test whether the student recognizes the correct sign pattern.
Q25. If is a polynomial of degree 3, what is the general form of when evaluated using tabular integration?
📖 Explanation: When integrating , tabular integration differentiates (a degree 3 polynomial) to a degree 2 polynomial, then degree 1, then a constant, then zero. Each derivative is multiplied by an integral of (which is always a constant multiple of ) and summed. Since the derivatives of a degree 3 polynomial are polynomials of degree 3, 2, 1, and 0, the sum of these terms is still a polynomial of degree 3 (because the leading term from the first product does not cancel with anything else). Therefore, the antiderivative is of the form times a polynomial of degree 3.
Q26. A student evaluates using tabular integration and gets . What error did they make?
📖 Explanation: The correct Easy for involves differentiating to , and integrating to . With signs , the result is: . Simplifying gives . The student's result has instead of , which is correct. Let's re-check the student's result: . This matches the correct result. The student made no error. The question is flawed in stating there is an error.
Q27. For the integral , the tabular method yields a result with which of the following characteristics?
📖 Explanation: When integrating a polynomial times , the tabular method produces a result that contains both sine and cosine terms. This is because the derivatives of the polynomial produce constant terms, and the integrals of alternate between and , creating a mix. The final answer will have terms with from some rows and from other rows, making it a combination of both trigonometric functions. This is a general property of such integrals.
Q28. Suppose you use tabular integration for and get . What would be the result of ?
📖 Explanation: Using the antiderivative , evaluate from 0 to : . This demonstrates how tabular integration can be directly applied to definite integrals. The process of finding the antiderivative is the same; the limits are applied afterward.
Q29. When using tabular integration for , the process leads to an equation involving the original integral. What is the equation?
📖 Explanation: For , the tabular method differentiates (which cycles) and integrates (which also cycles). Setting up the table and applying the signs yields: (the original integral). This leads to . Solving for the integral gives , so . This method is an extension of tabular integration to non-terminating functions.
Q30. A student argues that tabular integration by parts is 'just a shortcut' and doesn't require understanding integration by parts. Which statement best counters this argument?
📖 Explanation: Tabular integration by parts is derived directly from the standard integration by parts formula . Understanding this derivation is essential for correctly applying the method, especially when determining the sign pattern, identifying when to stop the table, and extending the method to non-polynomial functions. Viewing it as a mere shortcut without understanding its mathematical foundation can lead to errors in complex problems. The method is a structured Easy of the product rule in integral form, not a separate or independent technique.
Q31. An integral is given. The tabular method is used, and the polynomial column differentiates to zero in 4 steps. The integral column is integrated 4 times. How many rows will the table have?
📖 Explanation: If a polynomial differentiates to zero in 4 steps, this means the polynomial has degree 3 (since the 4th derivative is zero). The table includes the original polynomial as the first row, then each derivative as a subsequent row, ending with the zero row. Therefore, the number of rows is 4 (the non-zero derivatives) + 1 (the zero row) = 5 rows. Alternatively, if 'differentiates to zero in 4 steps' means the 4th derivative is zero, then there are 4 non-zero rows (the function and its first 3 derivatives) and 1 zero row, totaling 5 rows.
Q32. Which of the following integrals would be the MOST Hard to evaluate using tabular integration by parts?
📖 Explanation: While and are straightforward Easys of tabular integration (with a polynomial factor), is Hard because neither function differentiates to zero. The tabular method must be extended to handle the cyclic nature of the derivatives and integrals of the exponential and trigonometric functions. This requires setting up the table, identifying the cycle, and solving an algebraic equation for the original integral. is a simple substitution problem and not a typical candidate for tabular integration. Thus, the cyclic case is the most complex Easy of the method.
Q33. For the integral , which of the following correctly lists the products of the rows with alternating signs starting with ?
📖 Explanation: For , differentiate to get . Integrate to get . Applying the signs , the products are: (row 0, sign +), (row 1, sign -), (row 2, sign +), (row 3, sign -). So the expression is , which simplifies to .
Q34. A student evaluating using tabular integration obtains . What is the most likely source of error?
📖 Explanation: Let's trace the correct process: Differentiate to . Integrate to . Applying signs , the correct result is , which simplifies to . The student's answer has and , which suggests they incorrectly combined terms or used the wrong integral values for . The coefficient of should be , not . This indicates an error in the integration of or the signs.
Q35. In the context of tabular integration, if the polynomial column is p(x), p'(x), p''(x), \dots, 0, and the integral column is , the final answer is the sum of . What determines the sign for the -th term?
📖 Explanation: The alternating signs in tabular integration by parts come from the repeated Easy of the integration by parts formula . If and , the sign for the -th term is , where is the order of the derivative. This is because each Easy of the formula introduces a minus sign. Therefore, the first term (k=0) is positive, the second (k=1) is negative, the third (k=2) is positive, and so on. This alternation is a fundamental property of the method, derived directly from the product rule.