š Reduction formulas for integrals (36 MCQs)
š From Calculus ⢠8. Principles of integral Evaluation ⢠36 questions available
What is Reduction formulas for integrals?
Definition:
Reduction formulas express an integral involving a parameter in terms of a similar integral with a lower parameter or , recursively simplifying complex powers until reaching a base case.
Example:
For , the formula is , reducing to simpler terms.
Reason:
They provide a systematic way to handle high-power trigonometric or algebraic integrals that are otherwise difficult to solve directly, breaking them down into manageable steps.
š All Reduction formulas for integrals MCQs
Q1. What is the primary purpose of deriving reduction formulas for integrals involving powers of trigonometric functions?
š Explanation: Reduction formulas are derived to express an integral, like ā«sināæx dx, in terms of an integral with a lower power, such as sināæā»Ā²x. This iterative process simplifies the integration of high powers. They don't replace all substitutions or handle definite integrals on their own; they are a tool to reduce complexity step-by-step.
Q2. Given the reduction formula ā«cosāæx dx = (1/n)cosāæā»Ā¹x sin x + ((n-1)/n)ā«cosāæā»Ā²x dx, what would be the first step to evaluate ā«cosā¶x dx?
š Explanation: Correct Easy involves substituting n=6 into the formula. The second term's integral becomes ā«cosā“x dx, which is a lower power. Option B incorrectly repeats the original integral, option C uses an incorrect power for the first term, and option D uses a minus sign. This demonstrates a direct Easy of the formula.
Q3. A student uses the reduction formula for ā«sināæx dx and gets the result -1/4 sin³x cos x + 3/8 x - 3/16 sin 2x. What was the original integral?
š Explanation: Applying the reduction formula (1) to n=4 gives -1/4 sin³x cos x + (3/4)ā«sin²x dx. Evaluating ā«sin²x dx as (1/2)x - (1/4)sin 2x yields (3/8)x - (3/16)sin 2x. This matches the result. The student correctly applied the formula. Other options would give different results, so by comparing the structure of the answer with the pattern from the reduction formula, we can identify the original power.
Q4. Which of the following correctly represents the reduction formula for ā«cosāæx dx?
š Explanation: The derivation uses u=cosāæā»Ā¹x and dv=cosx dx. This gives du=-(n-1)cosāæā»Ā²x sinx dx and v=sinx. Integration by parts yields cosāæā»Ā¹x sinx + (n-1)ā«sin²x cosāæā»Ā²x dx. Replacing sin²x with 1-cos²x and simplifying gives the formula. Option A is the correct standard reduction formula.
Q5. A student uses reduction formula (9) to evaluate ā«sināµx dx and obtains -1/5 sinā“x cosx + 4/5(-1/3 sin²x cosx - 2/3 cosx). What does this expression simplify to after collecting terms?
š Explanation: Applying the formula for n=5 gives -1/5 sinā“x cosx + 4/5ā«sin³x dx. Then ā«sin³x dx = -1/3 sin²x cosx - 2/3 cosx. Multiplying by 4/5 gives -4/15 sin²x cosx - 8/15 cosx. The final expression is -1/5 sinā“x cosx - 4/15 sin²x cosx - 8/15 cosx. The other options have incorrect signs or coefficients, indicating a common error in applying the formula.
Q6. What would be the most efficient way to evaluate ā«sinā¶x dx using reduction formulas?
š Explanation: Reduction formula (9) reduces the power of sin x by 2 each time it is applied. Starting with n=6, it goes to ā«sinā“x dx, then to ā«sin²x dx. This is the most systematic approach. Option C is a common misconception; the power of sin is not a power of a variable x. The goal is to reduce the exponent, which the formula does efficiently.
Q7. The reduction formula for ā«cosāæx dx is derived using the identity sin²x = 1 - cos²x. What would happen if a student mistakenly used sin²x = 1 + cos²x?
š Explanation: The derivation of the reduction formula relies on substituting sin²x = 1 - cos²x to get an expression in terms of cosx only. Using 1+cos²x would not allow for the separation of terms to yield the reduction formula. This mistake highlights the importance of knowing and applying correct trigonometric identities. The resulting expression would not simplify to the standard reduction formula.
Q8. A student is asked to derive the reduction formula for ā«cosāµx dx using integration by parts. Which choice of u and dv would lead to the correct derivation?
š Explanation: Choosing u=cosā“x and dv=cosx dx allows for the use of integration by parts. The derivative du = -4cos³x sinx dx is readily obtained, and v=sinx. This leads to an expression involving sin²x which is then substituted to relate it back to cosāµx and cos³x. Other choices lead to either a more complex integral or a dead end, demonstrating the strategy behind choosing u and dv.
Q9. A student is trying to evaluate ā«sin³x dx and writes the answer as 1/3 cos³x - cosx + C. Is this correct?
š Explanation: Using the reduction formula with n=3 gives -1/3 sin²x cosx + 2/3ā«sinx dx = -1/3 sin²x cosx - 2/3 cosx. Substituting sin²x = 1 - cos²x and simplifying gives -1/3(1-cos²x)cosx - 2/3 cosx = -1/3 cosx + 1/3 cos³x - 2/3 cosx = 1/3 cos³x - cosx + C. The student's answer is correct. Option D is a common sign error.
Q10. Which reduction formula would be used to evaluate an integral of the form ā«tanāæx dx?
š Explanation: The standard reduction formula for powers of tangent is ā«tanāæx dx = (tanāæā»Ā¹x)/(n-1) - ā«tanāæā»Ā²x dx. This is derived using the identity tan²x = sec²x - 1. Option A is correct. Option B has incorrect signs. Option C is the formula for powers of secant. Option D is incorrect because the denominator is n instead of n-1.
Q11. A student applies the reduction formula for ā«tanā¶x dx and obtains (tanāµx)/5 - (tan³x)/3 + tanx - x + C. Which of the following statements is true?
š Explanation: Applying the formula to n=6: ā«tanā¶x dx = tanāµx/5 - ā«tanā“x dx. Then ā«tanā“x dx = tan³x/3 - ā«tan²x dx, and ā«tan²x dx = tanx - x. Substituting back gives tanāµx/5 - tan³x/3 + tanx - x + C. The student's answer is correct and complete. This shows a good understanding of how to use the reduction formula iteratively.
Q12. The reduction formula for ā«secāæx dx is ā«secāæx dx = (secāæā»Ā²x tanx)/(n-1) + ((n-2)/(n-1))ā«secāæā»Ā²x dx. Why is this formula significant for evaluating integrals of odd powers of secant?
š Explanation: The reduction formula reduces the power of secx by 2. By repeatedly applying it, the exponent can be reduced. If n is odd, the process eventually leads to ā«secx dx, which is a known formula. Option A correctly states this. If n were even, it would lead to ā«sec²x dx. This is the key to integrating odd powers of secant.
Q13. A student uses the reduction formula for ā«cosāæx dx to evaluate ā«cosāµx dx. Their final answer is (1/5)cosā“x sinx + (4/15)cos²x sinx + (8/15)sinx + C. What is the most likely error?
š Explanation: The correct process: n=5 gives 1/5 cosā“x sinx + 4/5ā«cos³x dx. Then ā«cos³x dx = 1/3 cos²x sinx + 2/3ā«cosx dx = 1/3 cos²x sinx + 2/3 sinx. So the final answer should be 1/5 cosā“x sinx + 4/15 cos²x sinx + 8/15 sinx + C. The student's answer is correct, so they didn't make an error. The question asks for the most likely error if they got a different answer. If they didn't integrate the final ā«cosx dx, the answer would be incorrect, but the given answer is correct.
Q14. What is the value of ā«ā^{Ļ/2} sināøx dx using the Wallis sine formula?
š Explanation: The Wallis sine formula for even n=8 is (Ļ/2) * ((1*3*5*7)/(2*4*6*8)) = (Ļ/2)*(105/384) = 105Ļ/768 = 35Ļ/256. Option C is correct. Other options result from miscalculating the product or the factor of Ļ/2. This requires recall and Easy of the Wallis formula, which is a direct Easy of the reduction formula (9) for definite integrals.
Q15. A student derives a reduction formula for ā«xāæeĖ£ dx as ā«xāæeĖ£ dx = xāæeĖ£ - nā«xāæā»Ā¹eĖ£ dx. This formula is useful because:
š Explanation: The formula reduces the exponent of x from n to n-1. By applying it repeatedly, the exponent of x eventually becomes zero, leading to the integral of eĖ£. This makes it a powerful tool for integrating polynomials multiplied by eĖ£. The other options are incorrect; the formula works on the polynomial part, not the exponential part.
Q16. Given the reduction formula ā«xāæ eĖ£ dx = xāæ eĖ£ - nā«xāæā»Ā¹ eĖ£ dx, which of the following is the result for n=3?
š Explanation: Applying the formula n=3 gives x³eĖ£ - 3ā«x²eĖ£ dx. For n=2, ā«x²eĖ£ dx = x²eĖ£ - 2ā«xeĖ£ dx. For n=1, ā«xeĖ£ dx = xeĖ£ - ā«eĖ£ dx = xeĖ£ - eĖ£. Substituting back: x³eĖ£ - 3x²eĖ£ + 6xeĖ£ - 6eĖ£ + C. Option A is correct. This Hard tests the sequential Easy of the formula.
Q17. Which of the following is a correct Easy of the reduction formula for ā«sināæx dx to solve ā«sin²x dx?
š Explanation: Using the formula for n=2: ā«sin²x dx = -1/2 sinx cosx + 1/2ā«dx = -1/2 sinx cosx + x/2 + C. Option A is correct. Option B has the wrong sign on the first term. Option C has the wrong sign on the x term. Option D has the wrong sign on both terms. This is a foundational Easy of the formula.
Q18. A student is evaluating ā«sin³x cos²x dx. They decide to use the reduction formula for sin³x. Is this the most efficient approach?
š Explanation: The reduction formulas are designed for integrals of a single trigonometric function raised to a power, like ā«sināæx dx. The integrand sin³x cos²x is a product of two different functions. While one could potentially apply the reduction formula after manipulating it, the most efficient method is to use the strategies for integrating products of sines and cosines (e.g., Table 7.3.1), such as using u=cosx. The student's approach, while not impossible, is inefficient. The question highlights that choosing the right method is a key skill.
Q19. The reduction formula for ā«secāæx dx involves a term with secāæā»Ā²x tanx. This structure is derived from:
š Explanation: The formula is derived using integration by parts. Choosing u=secāæā»Ā²x and dv=sec²x dx allows the derivative of u to involve secāæā»Ā²x tanx, and v=tanx. This structure is what leads to the final reduction formula. While the other options are related identities, they are not the primary method for deriving this specific reduction formula.
Q20. Suppose you are evaluating ā«sinā·x dx and have applied the reduction formula to get ā«sināµx dx, then ā«sin³x dx, and finally ā«sinx dx. How many times was the reduction formula applied?
š Explanation: The formula reduces the power by 2 each time. Starting with n=7: 7 -> 5 -> 3 -> 1. This is 3 Easys of the formula. Option A is correct. A student might incorrectly count 4 times by including the final integration of sinx, or 7 by confusing n with the number of steps. This tests the understanding of the iterative process.
Q21. A student is deriving the reduction formula for ā«sināæx dx. After integration by parts, they have the expression: -sināæā»Ā¹x cosx + (n-1)ā«cos²x sināæā»Ā²x dx. To get the standard reduction formula, what is the next correct step?
š Explanation: To get an integral solely in terms of sinx, we must eliminate cos²x. The identity cos²x = 1 - sin²x is used for this purpose. This allows the integral to be split into ā«sināæā»Ā²x dx and ā«sināæx dx, which can then be rearranged to solve for ā«sināæx dx. The other options would not lead to the correct simplification. This step is crucial for the derivation.
Q22. What is the purpose of a reduction formula in the context of evaluating integrals involving powers of a function?
š Explanation: The primary function of a reduction formula is to reduce the complexity of an integral. By lowering the power, it makes the integral simpler to evaluate. It does not directly give the antiderivative; it provides a relationship between integrals of different powers. The other options are incorrect; a reduction formula often still requires other methods (like basic integrals) to finish the evaluation.
Q23. Which of the following demonstrates a correct Easy of the reduction formula for ā«tanāæx dx?
š Explanation: Applying the formula with n=3: ā«tan³x dx = (tan²x)/2 - ā«tanx dx = (tan²x)/2 - ln|secx| + C. Option A is correct. Option B uses sec²x instead of tan²x. Option C has the incorrect coefficient for tan²x. Option D has the wrong sign for the log term. This is a direct Easy of the formula.
Q24. A student incorrectly writes the reduction formula for ā«cosāæx dx as ā«cosāæx dx = (1/n)cosāæx tanx + ((n-1)/n)ā«cosāæā»Ā²x dx. What is the best way to identify this error?
š Explanation: The student's written formula is actually equivalent to the correct one. Since tanx = sinx/cosx, then (1/n)cosāæx tanx = (1/n)cosāæā»Ā¹x sinx. The coefficient ((n-1)/n) is also correct. Therefore, the student's formula is not an error; it's a correct, albeit less common, form. The best way to identify that this isn't an error is to simplify it using the identity tanx = sinx/cosx. This question tests the ability to recognize equivalent forms.
Q25. What is the primary advantage of using reduction formulas over other methods, such as substitution, when integrating powers of trigonometric functions?
š Explanation: Reduction formulas are most useful for integrals like ā«sināæx dx where the integrand is a single power of a function. They provide a clear, step-by-step procedure to reduce the power until a basic integral is reached. While other methods like substitution might work for some powers, reduction formulas are systematic and reliable. The other options are not accurate; reduction formulas often require the use of identities and are not universally applicable.
Q26. A student uses a reduction formula to evaluate a definite integral and gets a result involving an integral with a lower power. They then apply the formula again. What is this an example of?
š Explanation: The process of repeatedly applying a reduction formula is called an iterative process. Each Easy reduces the complexity, bringing the problem closer to a known solution. It is not cyclical because the power decreases each time; it doesn't return to the original problem. The other options are incorrect. This is a fundamental concept in understanding how to use reduction formulas.
Q27. A student is evaluating ā«x³ eĖ£ dx using the reduction formula. After applying the formula, they get x³eĖ£ - 3x²eĖ£ + 6xeĖ£ - 6eĖ£. What mistake did they make?
š Explanation: The integration process is correct, and the resulting expression is the antiderivative. However, the student omitted the constant of integration, +C. This is a common error. The question tests the ability to identify incomplete work, not just computational errors. The other options are not errors in this case; the signs and coefficients are correct and the formula was applied the correct number of times.
Q28. Which of the following integrals would be most efficiently evaluated using a reduction formula for powers of a trigonometric function?
š Explanation: The integral ā«cosāµx dx is a classic case where a reduction formula for cosāµx is directly applicable. The other integrals are better suited for other techniques: ā«sin²x cos³x dx uses substitution (u=sinx or u=cosx), ā«x cosx dx uses integration by parts, and ā«eĖ£ sinx dx uses integration by parts (or a specific technique for exponentials and sines). This tests the ability to recognize when a reduction formula is the appropriate tool.
Q29. A student is evaluating ā«cosā·x dx. Their answer is (1/7)cosā¶x sinx + (6/35)cosā“x sinx + (24/105)cos²x sinx + (48/105)sinx. What is a potential issue with this final form?
š Explanation: The answer is derived from applying the reduction formula correctly. However, the coefficients can be simplified: 24/105 simplifies to 8/35, and 48/105 simplifies to 16/35. The answer is valid and correct, just not in its simplest form. This highlights that while a process can be correct, the final answer might require simplification. The student's work is not wrong, just incomplete in its presentation.
Q30. The reduction formula for ā«secāæx dx is often used to evaluate ā«sec³x dx. The result is (1/2)secx tanx + (1/2)ln|secx+tanx| + C. This result is important because:
š Explanation: The integral of sec³x is a classic and useful result that appears frequently in Easys, particularly in arc length and surface area problems. The reduction formula provides a systematic way to derive it. Option A is correct. The other options are false; secx is integrable, its integral is not tanx, and the reduction formula can be used for other powers.
Q31. A student is asked to evaluate ā«ā^{Ļ/2} sinā¶x dx. They use the Wallis formula and get 5Ļ/32. Which of the following is the correct evaluation of this integral?
š Explanation: Using the Wallis sine formula for even n=6: (Ļ/2) * ((1*3*5)/(2*4*6)) = (Ļ/2)*(15/48) = 15Ļ/96 = 5Ļ/32. Option A is correct. A common error is forgetting the factor of Ļ/2. This tests the recall and Easy of the Wallis formula, which is a direct Easy of the reduction formula.
Q32. What is the role of the constant of integration when using a reduction formula to find an indefinite integral?
š Explanation: When using reduction formulas, the focus is on reducing the integral to a simpler form. The constant of integration is not added during the intermediate steps. Once the final integral is evaluated, the constant of integration, +C, is added to the final antiderivative to represent the most general solution. Adding it at each step is unnecessary and can complicate the process.
Q33. A student is evaluating ā«tanā“x dx. Which of the following represents the first Easy of the reduction formula?
š Explanation: The reduction formula for tanāæ is ā«tanāæx dx = (tanāæā»Ā¹x)/(n-1) - ā«tanāæā»Ā²x dx. For n=4, this gives (tan³x)/3 - ā«tan²x dx. Option A is correct. Option B has the wrong sign. Option C uses the wrong coefficient. Option D uses the formula for n=3 instead of n=4. This tests the ability to correctly apply the formula for a given n.
Q34. A student is evaluating ā«sinā¶x dx. They decide to rewrite it as ā«(sin²x)³ dx and integrate using the power rule. What is the error in this approach?
š Explanation: The power rule for integration, ā«uāæ du = uāæāŗĀ¹/(n+1) + C, applies when the variable of integration is u. In ā«sinā¶x dx, the variable of integration is x, but the base of the power is sinx. To use the power rule, the integrand would need to be sinā¶x * cosx, so that du = cosx dx. The student is incorrectly treating sinx as the variable of integration. Option B correctly identifies this misconception.
Q35. A reduction formula for ā«xāæ sinx dx is given. How would you use it to evaluate ā«x³ sinx dx?
š Explanation: A reduction formula for ā«xāæ sinx dx would express the integral in terms of ā«xāæā»Ā¹ sinx dx and some other terms. By applying it repeatedly, n is reduced by 1 each time. When n=0, the integral becomes ā«sinx dx, which is a standard integral. Option A describes this iterative process correctly. The power of x, not sinx, is being reduced.
Q36. When deriving the reduction formula for ā«cosāæx dx, what is the purpose of the identity sin²x = 1 - cos²x?
š Explanation: After applying integration by parts with u=cosāæā»Ā¹x and dv=cosx dx, we get an integral with sin²x cosāæā»Ā²x. To express this entirely in terms of cosx, we replace sin²x with 1 - cos²x. This allows us to combine terms with cosāæx and cosāæā»Ā²x, which is necessary to solve for the original integral. This step is crucial for deriving the formula.